Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 GA 227 - Rouse v. State

Rouse v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2000 · most notably Adsitt v. State (1981), Boyd v. State (1951)

30 state decisions

701910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warrick v. State · Southern Railway Co. v. Brown · Golatt v. State · Bourquin v. Bourquin · Ryder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There being no statute prescribing the weight which shall be given to the testimony of an expert, what consideration such evidence is entitled to is a question solely for the jury.” Rouse v. State, 135 Ga. 227 (1) ( 69 SE 180 ). See also Ginn v. Morgan, 225 Ga. 192 (2) ( 167 SE2d 393 ). It is true that the majority seemingly agree with this ruling when they state:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.