Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 KAN 242 - Beeching v. Beeching

Beeching v. Beeching’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1939
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Scarborough v. Smith · Scantlin v. Allison · Flack v. Gosnell · Stephenson v. Patton · Mackey v. Mackey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court shall have full power to make any order not inconsistent with the provisions of this article that may be necessary to make a just and equitable partition between the parties, and to secure their respective interests.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.