Kafka v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2008
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Corrigan v. City of Chicago · Lawrence v. City of Boston · Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley Railroad · King v. Minneapolis Union Railway Co. · Keegan v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The interests of the various parties entitled to share in the award not having been determined as between each other, each is entitled to the proportional part of the award which the amount of his damage bears to the amount of all the damage to the property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hockman v. Lindgren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.