Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 MO 223 - Ex parte Smith

Ex parte Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

1 district · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2006 · most notably Williams v. Kaiser (1945), State Ex Rel. Williams v. Marsh (1982)

1 district · 52 state decisions — followed in 10 states

90189619001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Siebold · City of St. Louis v. Roche · Ex parte Swann · Ex parte Marmaduke · City of St. Louis v. Fitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Human laws and human agencies have not yet arrived at such a degree of perfection as to be able without some overt act done to discern and to determine by what intent or purpose the human heart is actuated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.