Allred v. Smith.’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2023
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Armfield v. . Moore · Odom v. . Riddick · William Falls v. . Robert F. Gamble · Gilchrist v. . Middleton · Caldwell v. . Neely
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In respect to title, interest, or estate to or in the common tenement they are-strangers, and no act done by one can affect, inure to the benefit of, or injure the other. * * * In respect to the title no act by one can affect the other. * * * It would be an anomaly in the law if one tenant in common could, by matter in pais, deed, or record, estop his co-tenant in respect to his title, in regard to which they are absolute strangers. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No one can be bound by or take advantage of the estoppel of another who does not succeed or hold subordinately to his position.’’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. March
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.