135 N.C. App. 43 - Frazier v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Danner v. Kentucky · Meyer v. Walls · Braswell v. Braswell · Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports Authority · National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Disciplinary Hearing Commission clearly had authority to discipline and disbar plaintiff. [ N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 84-28 , 84-28.1 (1995).] N.C. Gen. Stat. § 84-28.1 (b) authorizes the Disciplinary Hearing Commission to ‘hold hearings in discipline, incapacity and disability matters, to make findings of fact and conclusions of law after such hearings, and to enter orders necessary to carry out the duties delegated to it by the council.’ [ N.C. Gen. Stat. § 84-28.1 (b).]””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Moreover, the General Assembly intended to vest the Disciplinary Hearing Commission with the statutory authority to enforce its order of disbarment by criminal contempt powers comparable to those of the general courts of justice. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 84-28.1 (b) provides that “[t]he disciplinary hearing commission of the North Carolina State Bar, or any committee thereof, acting through its chairman, shall have the power to hold persons, firms or corporations in contempt as provided in Chapter 5A." Chapter 5A outlines the criminal contempt powers of the general courts of justice. Since the Disciplinary Hearing Commission was acting within its statutory authority in exercising its contempt powers, any claim for negligence in the performance of its duties would come within the public duty doctrine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Tort Claims Act does not give the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to award damages based on intentional acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.