135 N.C. App. 715 - Meehan v. Cable’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Smith · Dickinson v. Pake · 125 N.C. App. 603 - Smith v. Johnson · 116 N.C. App. 263 - Nationsbank of North Carolina, N.A. v. Baines · 105 N.C. App. 218 - Cobb v. Reitter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for extending time for taking appeal). The mere recitation of the rule number relied upon by the movant is not a statement of the grounds within the meaning of Rule 7(b)(1). The motion, to satisfy the requirements of Rule 7(b)(1), must supply information revealing the basis of the motion. In this case the defendants indicate in the motion that they rely on Rule 59(a)(2) & (7) as the bases of their motion. There are, however, no allegations in the motion revealing any”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.