Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 NH 264 - State v. Ebinger

State v. Ebinger’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2011

3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pierce · State v. O'Flynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether [a] defendant failed to become aware of a `substantial and unjustifiable risk' is determined by an objective test, not by reference to the defendant's subjective perception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “constitutes a gross deviation from the conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.