135 N.J. Eq. 29 - Applegate v. Applegate’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 111 N.J. Eq. 529 - Apfelbaum v. Apfelbaum · Calame v. Calame · 119 N.J. Eq. 462 - Phillips v. Phillips · 116 N.J. Eq. 101 - Second Nat. Bank of Paterson v. Curie · 129 N.J. Eq. 549 - Corbin v. Mathews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“subject to the control of the Court of Chancery, but not by way of specific performance,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.