135 N.J. Super. 35
342 A.2d 566
BEVERLY ROSS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID J. ROSS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1975-06-26
Relies on 126 N.J. Super. 394 - Ross v. Ross
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1975-06-26
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc. (1979), Miller v. Miller (1984)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Before Judges MICHELS, MORGAN and MILMED.
¶2Mr. John C. Love, attorney for the appellant (Mr. Melvin Randall on the brief).
¶3No brief was filed on behalf of the respondent.
¶4PER CURIAM.
¶5The order of the Essex County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Bellfatto in his opinion of December 5, 1973, reported at 126 N.J. Super. 394 (J.D.R. Ct. 1973).