Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 N.M. 11 - Martinez v. Martinez

Martinez v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc. · High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of Albuquerque · Roselli v. Rio Communities Service Station, Inc. · Gardner-Zemke Co. v. State · Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Conduct on the part of the defendant, giving rise to the situation of which complaint is made and for which the complainant seeks a remedy; (2) delay in asserting the complainant’s rights, the complainant having had knowledge or notice of the defendant’s conduct and having been afforded an opportunity to institute a suit; (3) lack of knowledge or notice on the part of the defendant that the complainant would assert the right on which [she] bases [her] suit; and (4) injury or prejudice to the defendant in the event relief is accorded to the complainant or the suit is not held to be barred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The failure to divide or distribute property on the entry of a decree of dissolution of marriage or of separation shall not affect the property rights of either the husband or wife, and either may subsequently institute and prosecute a suit for division and distribution or with reference to any other matter pertaining thereto that could have been litigated in the original proceeding for dissolution of marriage or separation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.