State v. Urban’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Garza (2009), State v. Dedman (2004)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · State v. Coffin · Zurla v. State · Salandre v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Barker , the [United States] Supreme Court identified three sources of prejudice in a delay: (1) oppressive pretrial incarceration, (2) anxiety and concern of the accused, and most importantly, (3) impairment of the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gallegos“as part of the pro forma pretrial motions [that the d]efendant's counsel filed upon entering his appearance[, s]uch pro forma motions are generally afforded relatively little weight”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gallegos“In general, the right [to a speedy trial] attaches when the defendant becomes an accused, that is, by a filing of a formal indictment or information or arrest and holding to answer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gallegos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.