Young v. Van Duyne’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2024
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Hicks v. State · Matter of Estate of Heeter · Smialek v. Begay · Ford v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety · Begay v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are under no obligation to search the record to locate information in order to save a party from lack of preservation of issues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“control over the . . . home as a licensed foster home.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“supervision of actual day-to-day operation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.