Parmenter v. . Fitzpatrick’s Empirical Analysis
1892
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1972 · most notably McCandless v. Furlaud (1935), Hotaling v. A. B. Leach & Co. (1928)
8 federal appellate · 2 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Campbell v. . Woodworth · Hoffman v. . Conner · Beach v. . Raritan Delaware Bay R.R. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If there were no other evidence upon the subject, it certainly would be sufficient for the jury to base a verdict upon, and, if there were other and contradictory evidence, then it should be placed before the jury for its consideration upon the question of value. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.