135 Ohio App. 3d 1
732 N.E.2d 1004
Decided August 10, 1999
Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1999-08-10
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-08-10
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2024
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 concurring in judgment only.
¶2 R.C. 2717.01 requires a name change applicant to provide one notice by publication. It appears to me that in the case sub judice, the trial court dismissed appellant’s name change application because after remand appellant failed to provide a second notice. I believe that the trial court erred in this regard. Thus, I agree with the principal opinion that the trial court’s judgment of dismissal should be reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.