135 Ohio App. 3d 207 - State v. Clifford’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Drummond (2006), State v. Ndina (2009)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Waller v. Georgia · 65 Ohio St. 3d 51 - State v. Schaim · State v. Torres · State v. Bayless · State v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prevail on a claim that the trial court erred in consolidating charges for trial, the defendant must demonstrate affirmatively (1) that his rights were prejudiced, (2) that at the time that the trial court ruled on the motion to consolidate, he provided the court with sufficient information so that it could weigh the considerations favoring joinder against the defendant's right to a fair trial, and (3) that given the information provided to the court, it abused its discretion in consolidating the charges for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“[The Prosecutor]: Judge before we go any further, a couple of times there are people in the back and I could — The Court: All right. All you folks in the back, get out of the courtroom now. Everybody out of the back there. Everybody out of the courtroom and wait outside and don't laugh or I will have you arrested. [Defense Counsel]: Could the grandfather and mother stay in? The Court: Everybody on that side, get out. All of you. Get out. Everybody out. Take the children with you please.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ndina“[t]wo or more offenses may be charged in the same indictment, * * * if the offenses charged, * * * are of the same or similar character, or are based on the same act or transaction, or are based on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, or are part of a course of criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.