135 Ohio App. 3d 555 - Rhoades v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2023
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 117 Ohio App. 3d 361 - Pollock v. Rashid · 89 Ohio App. 3d 787 - Insurance Co. of North America v. Reese Refrigeration · 130 Ohio St. 494 - Fulton v. State Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. · 74 Ohio App. 3d 606 - Lambdin v. Knott · 92 Ohio App. 3d 717 - Duffy v. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“{¶ 12} “It is the duty of the clerk of this court, in the absence of instructions from the court to the contrary, to accept for filing any paper presented to him, provided such paper is not scurrilous or obscene, is properly prepared and is accompanied by the requisite filing fee. The power to make any decision as to the propriety of any paper submitted or as to the right of a person to file such paper is vested in the court, not the clerk.” State ex rel. Wanamaker v. Miller (1955), 164 Ohio St. 176 , 177, 57 O.O.152, 128 N.E.2d 110 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Ohio Revised Code requires the clerk to endorse the date of filing on each document filed in a case, and the file-stamped date is presumed to reflect the actual date of filing. Ins. Co. of N. Am. [v. Reese Refrig. (1993)], 89 Ohio App. 3d at 790-791 , 627 N.E.2d 637 . However, that presumption can be refuted by evidence showing that the clerk received the document on a different date. Kloos v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr., 1988 Ohio App. LEXIS 1744 (May 3, 1988), Franklin App. No. 87AP-1215, unreported.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.