Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 Ohio App. 3d 708 - Shull v. Shull

135 Ohio App. 3d 708 - Shull v. Shull’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Duncan v. Chippewa Township Trustees · DeHart v. Aetna Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Form of objections. Objections shall be specific and state with particularity the grounds of objection. * * * Any objection to a finding of fact shall be supported by a transcript of all the evidence submitted to the magistrate relevant to that fact or an affidavit of that evidence if a transcript is not available. A party shall not assign as error on appeal the court's adoption of any finding of fact or conclusion of law unless the party has objected to that finding or conclusion under this rule.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although this rule clearly states that a transcript or an affidavit of the evidence must accompany a party's objections to a magistrate's decision, the rule does not establish a time within which the objecting party must file such evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.