Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 Ohio App. 3d 746 - State v. Hooks

135 Ohio App. 3d 746 - State v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 144 Ohio App. 3d 345 - State v. Hafer (2001), State v. Toler (2007)

51 state decisions

270200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 109 Ohio App. 3d 65 - State v. Brumback · 68 Ohio App. 3d 241 - State v. Friend · 95 Ohio App. 3d 169 - State v. Bruce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] sentence of restitution must be limited to the actual economic loss caused by the illegal conduct for which the defendant was convicted. * * * `Thus, restitution can be ordered only for those acts that constitute the crime for which the defendant was convicted and sentenced. ' * * * A trial court abuses its discretion when it orders restitution in an amount which has not been determined to bear a reasonable relationship to the actual loss suffered as a result of the offense for which the defendant was convicted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An award of restitution is limited to the actual loss caused by the defendant's criminal conduct for which he [or she] was convicted, and there must be competent and credible evidence in the record from which the court may ascertain the amount of restitution to a reasonable degree of certainty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “restitution by the offender to the victim of the offender's crime * * * in the amount based on the victim's economic loss.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.