Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 S. Ct. 701

State v. State

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 2014

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2014-11-19

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2018

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for,”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Florida v. Georgia

“with authority to ... direct subsequent proceedings,”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Florida v. Georgia

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-11-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1It is ordered that Ralph I. Lancaster, Esquire, of Portland, Maine, is appointed *702Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings, to direct subsequent proceedings, to summon witnesses, to issue subpoenas, and to take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Special Master is directed to submit Reports as he may deem appropriate. The compensation of the Special Master, the allowances to him, the compensation paid to his legal, technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his Reports, and all other proper expenses, including travel expenses, shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.

/135/sct/701 · .json · Public domain