Pelham v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 753 So. 2d 29 - Rodriguez v. State · 863 So. 2d 271 - Johnston v. State · 477 So. 2d 553 - Hill v. State · 970 So. 2d 312 - McDuffie v. State · 961 So. 2d 312 - Carratelli v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]lose cases involving challenges to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to impartiality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]ome of [the juror's] answers were equivocal, but she was 'absolutely' certain when she stated that she was defense-oriented”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We apply the abuse of discretion standard to a trial court's decision to deny a challenge for cause to a potential juror.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.