Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 So. 3d 1130

Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-04-02

Relies on Hughes v. State · Brown v. State · 110 So. 3d 419 - Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas

Decided 2014-04-02

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See Campbell v. State, 125 So.3d 733 (Fla.2013); Harper v. State, 110 So.3d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Harper v. State, 78 So.3d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Harper v. State, 999 So.2d 650 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (table decision); Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Anderson v. State, 779 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Harris v. State, 111 So.2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Green v. State, 765 So.2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); State v. McClain, 509 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Paul v. State, 830 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Harris v. State, 789 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); State v. Vesquez, 755 So.2d 674 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

CRENSHAW, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
/135/so3d/1130 · .json · Public domain