Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 So. 3d 1136

Singh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-04-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2016

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-04-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s finding that Bhupendra Ravi Singh (Appellant) violated his probation by committing new criminal offenses. However, the trial court failed to make the required written finding pursuant to section 948.06(8)(e)l., Florida Statutes (2012), as to whether Appellant “poses a danger to the community.” We remand for the trial *1137court to make that determination and to resentence Appellant accordingly.1

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

¶3. The sentence may not exceed the 43.55-month prison sentence previously imposed.

/135/so3d/1136 · .json · Public domain