Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 So. 3d 349

Dunklin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 2013

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-11-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2014

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Hallman v. State · S.A.P. v. Department of Children & Families

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Finding no reversible error, we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the judgment and sentence. However, because the record provides no indication that the trial court entered a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. See Pressley v. State, 903 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Hallman v. State, 845 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
/135/so3d/349 · .json · Public domain