Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 SO3D 440 - Hampton v. State

Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · 852 So. 2d 226 - FB v. State · 475 So. 2d 1021 - Pope v. State · Schlicher v. State · 611 So. 2d 1265 - State v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The offense of trafficking can be committed by one or more of the several acts delineated in the statute, including sale or delivery. A conspiracy to commit trafficking only requires that the co-conspirators agree to commit the same specified offense, not the same act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]rafficking in cocaine is an offense that can be committed in a variety of ways . Thus, the buyer and seller ... were, in fact, agreeing to commit the same crime (trafficking), albeit in different ways (one by purchasing, the other by selling).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “selling, purchasing, delivering, or possessing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.