Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 SW 1130 - McNeill v. Casey

McNeill v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 1964
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1964

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

30191119201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Watkins v. Junker · Schulz v. Frank Tessman & Bro. · Baker v. Smelser · Heidenheimer & Co. v. L. A. & Ellis · Commercial & Agricultural Bank v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The settled rule in this state with reference-to this matter seems to be that when interest is sought eo nomine, as flowing from and incident to the contract in writing sued upon, it will not be taken into account in determining the jurisdiction of the court; but the contrary is true where the same is sued for as an element of damages arising from the breach of the contract, and where the same is not specially recoverable as due under the contract itself.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Robinson v. Lingner
  2. ““On all written contracts ascertaining the sum payable, when no specified rate of interest is agreed upon by. the parties to the contract, interest shall be allowed at the rate of six per cent, per annum from and after the time when the sum is due and payable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Nueces Hotel Co. v. Ring

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.