Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 SW 185 - Comstock v. Lomax

Comstock v. Lomax’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 1962
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1962

13 state decisions

50191119201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bahn v. Starcke · Washington v. State · Kendrick v. Wheeler and Bowman · 16 Tex. Civ. App. 157 - Clopper v. Hutcheson · 50 Tex. Civ. App. 340 - Lomax v. Comstock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The writ of certiorari to annul proceedings of the county court in probate matters is not a writ of right in the sense that the proceeding will be revised for errors as on appeal. Relief is only granted in such cases when it is made to appear that the proceeding is void, or that some substantial wrong and injustice to the estate has been done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.