Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 S.W. 564

Fisher v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1911-03-08

<p>Criminal Law (§ 1144*) — Appeal—Review— Presumptions.</p> <p>In the absence of a statement of facts on appeal, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts produced in evidence.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3016-3037; Dec. Dig. § 1144.*]</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1952

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1911-03-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HARPER, J.

¶1Appellant was tried and convicted at the October term of the district court of Hunt county, being charged with passing a forged instrument.

¶2*565There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The indictment charges the defendant with passing a forged instrument. The charge submits this offense to the jury. In the absence of a statement of facts, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts introduced in evidence.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

/135/sw/564 · .json · Public domain