Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 SW 687 - Witt v. Byrum

Witt v. Byrum’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1937
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1937

6 state decisions

40191119201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unnecessary to cite authorities to sustain the proposition that, before a broker can recover commissions, he must show that he was the efficient and procuring cause of the sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.