Newbury v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) when a defendant exercises a peremptory challenge on a veniremember whom the trial court should have excused for cause at the defendant's request, (2) the defendant uses all of his statutorily allotted peremptory challenges, and (3) the defendant unsuccessfully requests an additional peremptory challenge which he claims he would use on another veniremember whom the defendant identifies as `objectionable' and who sits on the jury.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Gonzales v. State

2. “a defendant has been granted an additional peremptory challenge, he must show that two of his challenges for cause were erroneously denied in order to show that he was wrongfully `deprived' of `the use of at least one of his allotted peremptory challenges.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Gonzales v. State

3. “the trial court erred in allowing the State to present evidence of extraneous offenses that were not proved beyond a reasonable doubt in the punishment stage of trial.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Escamilla v. State