Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 SW3D 259 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 76th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Johnson v. State · Malik v. State · Wesbrook v. State · Royster v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No longer shall sufficiency of the evidence be measured by the jury charge actually given.”). Instead, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals announced that the test was based on the elements of the offense as defined by the hypothetically correct jury charge. Id. at 240 . 3 . There is no allegation that Article 62.101(b) is a statutorily alternative manner and means. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals cautioned that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Gollihar construct, therefore, does not apply to our analysis of [the defendant's] Jackson v. Virginia evidentiary sufficiency claim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.