Roach v. Rowley’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Probate Court)
Relationships
Relies on Burke v. Satterfield · Frazier v. Wynn · Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. · Nelkin v. Panzer · Wittner v. Scanlan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“probate order is final and appealable if it finally adjudicates a substantial right; if it merely leads to further hearings on the issue, the order is interlocutory.” Roach v. Rowley, 135 S.W.3d 845, 848 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (holding order final based in part on”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.