Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 SW3D 926 - Hughes v. State

Hughes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 204th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hernandez v. State · Ex Parte Graves · Bell v. State · Winters v. Presiding Judge of the Criminal District Court Number Three of Tarrant County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although we need not decide whether another remedy is available in a case in which a convicted person did not receive adequate assistance of counsel in a Chapter 64 proceeding, we may observe that, in some cases, a convicted person may get relief from defective representation by counsel through appeal under that chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.