Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 Tenn. 143

Bledsoe v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1916

Tennessee Supreme Court · decided 1916-04-15

<p>1. RAPE. Evidence. Corroboration of female.</p> <p>In Pub. Acts 1911, chapter 36, providing punishment for criminal abuse of females, the proviso that no conviction shall be had on the unsupported testimony of the female is complied with if there is adduced sufficient evidence of another than the female which fairly tends to convict the defendant of the crime. (Post, p. 144.) i</p> <p>Acts cited and construed: Acts 1911, ch. 36.</p> <p>Cases cited and approved: Clapp v. State, 94 Tenn., 186; Suther v. State, 118 Ala., 88; State v. Hayes, 105 Iowa, 82; State v. Brassfield, 81 Mo., 151.</p> <p>2. RAPE. Evidence. Corroboration of female.</p> <p>Such evidence need not be direct and positive, in the sense of being sufficient to convict, independent of that of the female alleged to have been debauched, but simply as to such facts or circumstances as tend to support the female in her testimony upon fact or facts éssential to constitute the offense. (Post, pp. 144, 145.)</p> <p>Cases cited and approved: Wright v. State, 31 Tex. Cr. R„ 354; State v. Smith, 84 Iowa, 522.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1916-04-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2013

3 state decisions

1019161920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Wirliams

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶2Conviction for violating the age of consent statute, and appeal.

¶3Acts 1911, chapter 36, providing for punishment for the criminal abuse of females, contains a proviso applicable to offenses against females of certain ages to the effect that “no conviction shall be had for said offense, on the unsupported testimony of the female in question.”

¶4This proviso is complied with if there is adduced sufficient evidence of another than the female which fairly tends to convict the defendant of the commission of the crime; and this evidence may be in relation to material and substantive fact or facts which may lead the jury to the finding that she is worthy of credit. Clapp v. State, 94 Tenn., 186, 195, 30 S. W., 214; Suther v. State, 118 Ala., 88, 24 South. 43; State v. Hayes, 105 Iowa, 82, 74 N. W., 757; State v. Brassfield, 81 Mo., 151, 51 Am. Rep., 234; 11 Enc. Ev., 698.

¶5Further, the corroborative evidence need not be direct and positive, in the sense of being sufficient to convict, independent of that of the female alleged to have been debauched, but simply as to such facts or circumstances as tend to support the female in her *145testimony upon fact or facts essential to constitute the offense. Wright v. State, 31 Tex. Cr. R., 354, 20 S. W., 756, 37 Am. St. Rep., 822; State v. Smith, 84 Iowa, 522, 51 N. W., 24.

¶6The legislative policy of this State, as evidenced by several enactments, has been consistently progressive in respect of the punishment of offenses of this character; and we believe that sound judicial policy dictates that the procedure under the acts should not be too stringent in respect of the proof requisite to support the female. The statutes were intended to safeguard the young womanhood of the State, thereby protecting the social fabric at its base; and we feel .no inclination to declare a stricter rule than the one above, touching proof thereunder.

¶7The testimony in the case at bar we find to be sufficient to corroborate the young girl debauched who testified in behalf of the State.

¶8Affirmed.

/135/tenn/143 · .json · Public domain