Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 Vt. 385 - Ryan v. Stearns

Ryan v. Stearns’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Freccia v. Martin · First National Bank of Fairbanks v. Taylor · Lamson v. Commercial Credit Corporation · Randolph National Bank v. Vail · Norton v. Haggett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Certainly, as acknowledged by both parties, the appellee stands to gain a substantial profit as a result of her resale of the property. This appears, however, to be a “so what?” proposition. The appellee having paid a consideration . . . for the property, we fail to discern any theory that would bar her from obtaining a profit----The appellee has paid a good and valid price for the property independent of the note, and is entitled to her profit. Similarly, she has purchased the subject promissory note for its face value plus interest. In the absence of any credible defense offered by the appellants, she is entitled to recover against those liable on the note.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.