Millay v. Cam’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably State v. Roggenkamp (2005), Millay v. Cam (1998)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 102 Wash. 2d 170 - Miebach v. Colasurdo · 107 Wash. 2d 503 - Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and Paroles · 102 Wash. 2d 355 - United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of Revenue · MONROE BY AND THROUGH BROULETTE v. Soliz · 117 Wash. 2d 805 - Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that where the Legislature uses certain language in one instance but different, dissimilar language in another, a difference in legislative intent is presumed.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“Courts do not amend statutes by judicial construction, nor rewrite statutes `to avoid difficulties in construing and applying them.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The predicates for equitable tolling are bad faith, deception, or false assurances by the defendant and the exercise of diligence by the plaintiff.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.