Hazel v. Van Beek’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2016
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 108 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc. · 102 Wash. 2d 170 - Miebach v. Colasurdo · Morton v. National Bank of New York City · 121 Wash. 2d 513 - Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries · 117 Wash. 2d 805 - Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a statute of limitation by allowing the creditor 30 days to act after the bankruptcy stay is lifted in those cases where the limitation period expires during the bankruptcy stay. Id. at 1073-74 . The Ninth Circuit has stepped back from its broad language in Hunters Run as well. In In re Southern Cal. Plastics, Inc., 208 B.R. 178 (B.A.P. 9th Cir.1997), a lienholder was required under state law to obtain a judgment on the lien within three years, but the debtor filed for bankruptcy, and the three-year period expired while the bankruptcy stay was in effect. The federal bankruptcy court ruled,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hazel v. Van Beek“Judgments of the district court of the United States rendered in any county in this state other than that in which the real estate of the judgment debtor to be affected is situated, ... from the time of the filing of a duly certified abstract of such judgment with the county clerk of the county in which the real estate of the judgment debtor to be affected is situated, as provided in this act[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hazel v. Van Beek“1. The plaintiff shall be entitled, on motion therefor, to have an order confirming the sale at the term next following the return of the execution, or if it be returned in term time, then at such term, unless the judgment debtor ... shall file with the clerk ten days before such term, or if the writ be returned in term time, then five days after the return thereof, his objections thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hazel v. Van Beek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.