Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 WASH2D 498 - State v. Young

State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
8
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably 222 Ill. 2d 530 - People v. Luedemann (2006), State v. Mendez (1999)

36 state decisions

280199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · Florida v. Bostick · California v. Hodari D. · 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`the threatening presence of several officers, the display of a weapon by an officer, some physical touching of the person of the citizen, or the use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with the officer's request might be compelled.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he test for disturbance of a person's private affairs under article I, section 7 is a purely objective one, looking to the actions of the law enforcement officer....”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"[a] police officer's conduct in engaging a defendant in conversation in a public place and asking for identification does not, alone, raise the encounter to an investigative detention." State v. Armenta, 134 Wash.2d 1, 11 , 948 P.2d 1280 (1997).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.