State v. Sagastegui’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Whitmore v. Arkansas · 117 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Lord · 125 Wash. 2d 570 - State v. Gentry · State v. Stenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[h]aving in mind the crime of which the defendant has been found guilty, are you convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that there are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]ur review of the record discloses no evidence that the jury violated the trial court's instruction to `not be influenced by passion [or] prejudice'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Elledge · State v. Woods
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.