135 Wis. 2d 477 - State v. Vonesh’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 155 Wis. 2d 633 - State v. Pulizzano (1990), Clinebell v. Commonwealth (1988)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck · 104 Wis. 2d 552 - Kollasch v. Adamany · 105 Wis. 2d 231 - State v. Clausen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One of the most valuable extrinsic aids of judicial construction is legislative history.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“"In State v. Gavigan, 111 Wis. 2d 150 (1983), the Wisconsin supreme court authorized the admission of evidence of the victim’s prior conduct if the evidence serves to prove a fact independent of the prior sexual conduct, if the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect and if the jury’s consideration of the evidence is for limited purposes. "This bill provides that the 3 statutorily recognized exceptions are the only exceptions to the general rule prohibiting admissibility of prior sexual conduct of an alleged sexual assault victim. A court may not allow other exceptions regardless of the purpose for the consideration.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“does not only bar evidence of complainant’s sexual activity prior to the alleged rape. It bars, with two narrow exceptions, evidence of all sexual activity by the complainant not incident to the alleged rape.” Id. III. APPLICATION OF EXCEPTION Gulrud argues that evidence that the complaining witness had sexual intercourse with a third party was admissible under the exception stated in sec. 972.11(2)(b)2, Stats., which permits evidence of specific instances of sexual conduct showing the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.