Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 Wis. 2d 58 - Treiber v. Knoll

135 Wis. 2d 58 - Treiber v. Knoll’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund (2005), State v. Smith (2010)

60 state decisions

2801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roe v. Wade · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Boddie v. Connecticut · Harris v. McRae · Johnson v. Avery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is designed to assure that those who are similarly situated will be treated similarly.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[U]nless a statute may be said to affect a "fundamental right”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If there is any reasonable basis upon which the legislation may constitutionally rest, the court must assume that the legislature had such fact in mind and passed the act pursuant thereto. The court cannot try the legislature and reverse its decision as to the facts. All facts necessary to sustain the act must be taken as conclusively found by the legislature, if any such facts may be reasonably conceived in the mind of the court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.