Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 135 W. Va. 716 - Furman v. Hunt

135 W. Va. 716 - Furman v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1985

10 state decisions

601951196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 131 W. Va. 429 - Estate of Elizabeth E. Fox · 123 W. Va. 696 - Boone v. Boone · 132 W. Va. 706 - Hunt v. Furman · Hurst's Adm'r v. Hite · Waller v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where service is performed by one at the instance and request of another, and especially where that other is personally benefited by the service, the law implies a contract, that the party, who performs the service, shall be paid a reasonable compensation therefor, unless there be something in the relation of the parties or the circumstances of the case, which precludes the idea of such compensation; in which case there would be an implied agreement or understanding, that no such compensation was to be paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]herever services are rendered and received, a contract of hiring or an obligation to pay compensation will generally be presumed. But qualifying the scope of this general rule of law, is another rule to the general effect that, in the absence of an express contract providing therefor, services rendered between near relatives living in the same household as members of the family are presumed to be gratuitous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.