Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

136 A.D. 899

In re De Groot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1909-12-15

Decided 1909-12-15

¶1Order of the Special Term modified in the following particulars: Ballot Exhibit Mo. 20 is a void ballot and should not have been counted for James McLaughlin. Ballot Exhibit Mo. 36 is a void ballot and should not have been counted for William A. De Groot. Ballot Exhibit, Mo. 29 *900is a void ballot and should not have been counted for James F. McLaughlin. Ballot Exhibit No. 42is a void ballot and should not have been counted for James F. McLaughlin. The order, in so far as it is appealed from, as so modified,should be affirmed, without costs to either party, and. a recount had in accordance with this decision. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Burr, Thomas and Rich, JJ., concurred.

/136/ad/899 · .json · Public domain