Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 Ariz. 360 - State v. Geschwind

State v. Geschwind’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably 754 So. 2d 691 - State v. Harbaugh (2000), State v. Leonard (1986)

37 state decisions

1401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Greenawalt · Dorsey v. State · State v. Mitchell · State v. Mitchell · Nix v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n all prosecutions in which a prior conviction is alleged, unless such conviction is an element of the crime charged,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “of the prior [DWI] conviction as an element of the crime rather than a mere sentencing consideration settles the question of appellant's entitlement to a bifurcated trial [in the negative] ... because proof of the prior conviction was part of the state's burden of proving all the elements of the crime charged.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]n all prosecutions in which a prior conviction is alleged, unless such conviction is an element of the crime charged, " the defendant is entitled to a bifurcated trial (emphasis supplied). ¶ 9 The supreme court vacated that part of the court of appeals' opinion; it held that the prior DUI conviction "is squarely within the express exception contained in the first sentence of rule 19.1(b), for cases in which the prior conviction is an element of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.