Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 Ariz. 45 - State v. Hunter

State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably State v. Hunter (1984), State v. Guerra (1989)

76 state decisions

3801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Pointer v. United States · United States v. Sealy, Inc. · Hance v. Georgia · State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether the State has proved the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, you may consider any evidence of the defendant’s running away, hiding, or concealing evidence, together with all the other evidence in the case. You may also consider the defendant’s reasons for running away, hiding or concealing evidence. Running away, hiding or concealing evidence after a crime has been committed does not by itself prove guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Premeditation” means that the defendant acts with either the intention or the knowledge that he will kill another human being, when such intention or knowledge precedes the killing by a length of time to permit reflection. An act is not done with premeditation if it is the instant effect of a sudden quarrel or heat of passion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The absence of evidence suggesting a motive for the commission of the crime charged is a circumstance in favor of the accused to be given such weight as the jury deems proper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.