State v. Moya’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 1995
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mincey · State v. Neil · 26 Ariz. App. 408 - State v. Brewer · State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. · State Ex Rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court of Phoenix
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“state would have been able to cross-examine [her] about her relationship to appellant . . . and her participation in illegal activities with appellant. . . . The evidence elicited as a result of such questioning would have been relevant in a subsequent trial against [her] for hindering prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The standard for determining whether error is prejudicial is whether it appears reasonably possible that the error may have materially influenced the jury in arriving at its verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.