In Re Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2015
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings Ass'n · Frank and Arlene Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corporation · Seidel v. Larson · Hougland v. Lomas & Nettleton Co. · Eastland Mortgage Co. v. Hart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he boilerplate language granting the mortgagee the right to receive and use property insurance proceeds in the event of some destruction of the property does not create an additional type of collateral securing the mortgage obligation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“all apparatus and fixtures of every kind for the purpose of supplying or distributing heat, light, water or power, and all plumbing and other fixtures”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Spano“that the property may be used for a commercial, income-producing purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.