136 Cal. App. 132 - Hill v. Peres’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 1966
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co. · Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co. · 42 Cal. App. 55 - Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Diamond v. Weyerhaeuser · Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The driver of an automobile is bound to use reason able care to anticipate the presence on the highway of others who have equal right to be there and the fact that his vision is temporarily interfered with, either by the glaring sun or headlights, does not relieve him from that duty.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Charter v. Olson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.