136 Cal. App. 2d 756 - People v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1956
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 44 Cal. 2d 434 - People v. Cahan · People v. Adamson · 25 Cal. 2d 422 - People v. Gilbert · 32 Cal. 2d 819 - People v. Tuthill · People v. Mooney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(People v. Adamson, 34 Cal.2d 320, 326 [ 210 P.2d 13 ] ; People v. Sica, 116 Cal.App.2d 59, 62 [ 253 P.2d 75 ].) The writ “is not intended to authorize any court to revise and review its opinions; but only to enable it to recall some adjudication made while some fact existed which, if before the court, would have prevented the rendition of the judgment, and which, without any fault or negligence of the party, was not presented to the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Collins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.