Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 CALAPP3D 403 - People v. Fuller

People v. Fuller’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2015 · most notably 42 Cal. 3d 711 - People v. Turner (1986), 35 Cal. 3d 161 - People v. Hall (1983)

4 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

2901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Berger v. United States · Swain v. State of Alabama · Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a party believes his opponent is using his peremptory challenges to strike jurors on the ground of group bias alone, he must raise the point in timely fashion and make a prima facie case of such discrimination to the satisfaction of the court. First, ... he should make as complete a record of the circumstances as is feasible. Second, he must establish that the persons excluded are members of a cognizable group within the meaning of the representative cross-section rule. Third, from all the circumstances of the case he must show a strong likelihood that such persons are being challenged because of their group association rather than because of any specific bias.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We believe that a fair reading of Wheeler requires only that the court find a reasonable inference of group bias once an appropriate foundation is laid in the first of the two stages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “intended to create different options for trial judges within one page of each other in so carefully crafted an opinion as the Wheeler opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.